PSH aka Kimera 757 ( talk) contribs) 13:23, Ap(UTC)ĭid I say discarded? Meh. Alas, since the game isn't out yet, and we don't have a complete mission tree, we don't really know what's canon and what's not yet.īut yes, the template is a good idea, as long as it's keeping the branching information separate. While there are branch missions, many if not most missions will be "required". I disagree that many missions are going to be "discarded". As WoL has a set ending and all the missions can be played, I was thinking it might be wise to implement a similar template (pretty much a copy paste), which would allow us to keep our in-universe style, but also be wary about making declarations without discetion. This allows the in-universe style to be kept, but also reminds the reader that it's up to the player how this progresses. In these cases, a template is used which declares how "this section assumes 100% completion of x-note that the events of this section may or may not be canon (can be seen in use here for example). Wookiepedia faces the same issue from sources such as Knights of the Old Republic, where the order of events or even what events occur are up to the player. However, using Wookiepedia as a source of inspiration, I may have an idea: Since that pretty much includes everything after Zero-Hour at this point in time, that leaves us with the dilemma of either being really careful in editing or simply leaving out info. 72.174.170.22 08:06, Septem(UTC)Īnyway, I've been going over articles in the context of Wings of Liberty and Browder's comments on how choices are entirely up to the player. You decided what happened there, we didn't decide, and it's hands-off for us down the road." That content is yours right? We have given to you, the player. "Question: With the branching paths you can take in the single-player campaign, like choosing to grab the artifact, how will it affect the canon?ĭustin Browder: Right now, I think we're assuming that Raynor finishes the game and that it ends in one way, but we simply won't let those choices be a part of the canon down the road.įollow-up: Back during like WC1 WC2 you pick the Alliance or the Horde game, so it'd be like that?ĭustin Browder: No, it will be like, we don't talk about the colonists from Haven anymore, because it would have been your choice as to how they lived or died or whatever happened to them, right?įollow-up: So they wouldn't factor it in.ĭustin Browder: We do not factor it in. Andra2404 !WARNING! Badge collector !WARNING! 14:38, Septem(UTC) Well, if Hawki says that, then you have your explanation, Mr. So, the evidence points to it being the true story.- Hawki 13:42, Septem(UTC) And as far as I know, they never said otherwise in the dvd. If they wanted to make it ambiguous, they wouldn't have made the cutscenes have a preferred variant. User:ImperialGuard1 Then why did someone remove the branching storyline for Gabriel Tosh ? - Andra2404 !WARNING! Badge collector !WARNING! 12:12, Septem(UTC) He picked Tosh and Hanson first, then he went back and showed what could have happened if you didn't pick them. The guy doing the commentating was demonstrating different outcomes between one choice verse the other. Never once did Blizzard ever say that there was a true story or canon choice. Andra2404 !WARNING! Badge collector !WARNING! 19:34, Septem(UTC) The bonus dvd says, according to our sources. Even in the Collector's Edition they never said which choice was actually canon, they just listed different outcomes in random order. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Tosh is the canon choice. In the info page, you have down that Raynor sided with Tosh.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |